Integrated Transport and Health Impact Modelling Tool (ITHIM) ) was originally developed out of work for the Lancet series on climate change mitigation and health 2009. Initially created as a spreadsheet model, a more recent Analytica model has been used in studies including São Paulo and the London Cycle Hire scheme. An international team of researchers is moving the model to R with a Shiny interface. This is a work in progress involving partners from UK, Switzerland, Brazil, USA and Canada. The work also involves collaboration with the World Health Organization, under the Urban Health Initiative, to adapt the tool for settings with limited evidence and data availability.
Please select User Case Study where you need to provide data for both baseline and scenarios
Please select Predefined Case Studies to see the ITHIM results for predefined locations.
Using GBD to derive local disease and mortality rates.
The process of conversion or matching of various data formats and variable definitions of external data to the generic data formats used in ITHIM. Including
The process of creating a Synthetic population (sample of 10k individuals), through probabilistic matching of separate input data from population, travel, and health surveys, for baseline.
The process of creating scenarios based on user-inputs. Users are given options to describe scenarios, by modifdyign baseline's data.
ITHIM uses non-linear dose response relationships based on total physical activity and applies these individual diseases. This approach allows that baseline travel and non-travel physical activity vary between populations and that the relative burden of diseases varies between countries.
Just like Physical Activity, ITHIM uses a non-linear dose relationship for calculating Air Pollution impacts.
Unlike most other models of walking and cycling ITHIM estimates injuries taking into account all the parties involved in collision. ITHIM uses a non-linear distance based method. That is the number of injuries is dependent on the distance travelled by all modes, but it is non-linear because it includes ‘safety-in-numbers’.
Calculates health gains measured as Years of Life Lost (YLL) and Premature Deaths Averted. The baseline for health comes from Global Burden of Disease Study
Displays histogram of total physical activity and also the percentage of the population meeting the physical activity guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO).
The WHO guidelines are for 150 minutes of moderate intensity or 75 minutes of vigorous intensity activity, with additional benefits by achieving 300 minutes of moderate intensity or 150 minutes of vigorous intensity activity. We have translated these guidelines into Marginal Metabolic Equivalent Task (MMET) hours per week. MMETs represent the body mass adjusted energy expenditure above resting. To do this we have assumed that moderate intensity activity is 3.5 MMETs, meaning that the lower target is 8.75 MMET hours per week, and the higher target is 17.5 MMET hours per week. We have assumed the MMET rates are 3.6 for walking, 5.4 for cycling, and 3.5 for ebikes (Costa et al., 2015 and Sperlich et al., 2012). Thus the lower target could be achieved by 145 minutes per week of walking, 97 minutes of cycling, or 150 minutes of ebiking.
Non-travel activity is estimated using self-reported data from probabilistically matched individuals of a similar age, gender, and ethnicity from the Health Survey for England 2012.
Users can choose to compare physical activity between selected sub-populations and the total population, and/or between selected scenarios and baseline.
Just like Physical Activity, ITHIM uses a non-linear dose relationship for calculating Air Pollution impacts.
Unlike most other models of walking and cycling ITHIM estimates injuries taking into account all the parties involved in collision. ITHIM uses a non-linear distance based method. That is the number of injuries is dependent on the distance travelled by all modes, but it is non-linear because it includes ‘safety-in-numbers’.
ITHIM is released under an Affero GPL and we accept no liability, included but not limited to loss or damages. The code of which is hosted on GitHub.
The ITHIM has been created by CEDAR. Those currently working on ITHIM R include:
de Sá TH, Tainio M, Goodman A, Edwards P, Haines A, Gouveia N, Monteiro CA, Woodcock J. (2017). The São Paulo we want? Health impact modelling of different travel patterns for São Paulo, Brazil. Environment International 108: 22–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.009
Sá TH, Duran AC, Tainio M, Monteiro CA Woodcock J. (2016). Cycling in São Paulo, Brazil (1997–2012): Correlates, time trends and health consequences. Preventive Medicine Reports 4: 540–545.
Goodman, A., Green, J., & Woodcock, J. (2014). The role of bicycle sharing systems in normalising the image of cycling: An observational study of London cyclists. Journal of Transport & Health, 1(1), 5–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2013.07.001
Woodcock J., Tainio M., Cheshire J., O’Brien O., Goodman A. (2014). Health effects of the London bicycle sharing system: health impact modelling study. British Medical Journal (BMJ) 348: g425. http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g425.long
Götschi, T., Tainio, M., Maizlish, N., Schwanen, T., Goodman, A., & Woodcock, J. (2015). Contrasts in active transport behaviour across four countries: How do they translate into public health benefits? Preventive Medicine. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.02.009
Kwan SC, Tainio M, Woodcock J, Sutan R, Hashim JH. (2017). The carbon savings and health co-benefits from the introduction of mass rapid transit system in Greater Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Journal of Transport & Health 6: 187-200. doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.06.006
Kwan SC, Tainio M, Woodcock J, Hashim JH. (2016). Health co-benefits in mortality avoidance from implementation of the mass rapid transit (MRT) system in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Reviews on Environmental Health 31(1):179-83. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2015-0038.
Maizlish N,Woodcock J, Co S, Ostro B, Fanai A, Fairley D. (2013). Health cobenefits and transportationrelated reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in the San Francisco Bay area. Am J Public Health. 103(4):703-709.
N. Maizlish, N.J. Linesch, J. Woodcock. (2017). Health and greenhouse gas mitigation benefits of ambitious expansion of cycling, walking, and transit in California. J. Transp. Health., 6, pp. 490-500
Woodcock J, Edwards P, Tonne C, Armstrong BG, Ashiru O, Banister D, et al (2009). Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport. Lancet 374:1930-43.
Woodcock J, Givoni M, Morgan AS. (2013). Health Impact Modelling of Active Travel Visions for England and Wales Using an Integrated Transport and Health Impact Modelling Tool (ITHIM). PLoS ONE. 8(1).
For more information or questions, please contact us at: jw745@cam.ac.uk